New Delhi (ABC Live): Performance Audit of Farm Support Schemes 2025: The Government of India has shifted its approach from ad-hoc loan waivers to a multi-scheme architecture, providing structured support to farmers. Key schemes include Minimum Support Price (MSP), PM-Kisan Samman Nidhi, Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY), Modified Interest Subvention Scheme (MISS), and the Agriculture
New Delhi (ABC Live): Performance Audit of Farm Support Schemes 2025: The Government of India has shifted its approach from ad-hoc loan waivers to a multi-scheme architecture, providing structured support to farmers. Key schemes include Minimum Support Price (MSP), PM-Kisan Samman Nidhi, Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY), Modified Interest Subvention Scheme (MISS), and the Agriculture Infrastructure Fund (AIF).
This Performance Audit 2025 by ABC Live applies a CAG-style Key Performance Indicator (KPI) framework to assess each scheme on Coverage, Efficiency, Equity, and Impact. The audit blends data journalism, tabulation, and analytical interpretation, setting a benchmark for evidence-based evaluation of farm policies.
Minimum Support Price (MSP)
| Metric | Value (2024–25) | 
|---|---|
| Procurement | 1,175 LMT | 
| MSP Paid | ?3.33 lakh crore | 
| Farmers Benefitted | 1.84 crore | 
Findings:
- 
MSP procurement remains regionally concentrated in Punjab, Haryana, and UP. 
- 
Only ~12% of farmers benefit, showing limited coverage. 
- 
While it ensures market stability, the scheme is fiscally heavy. 
? Interpretation: MSP is politically sensitive but inequitable — it supports a minority of farmers at a very high cost.
PM-Kisan Samman Nidhi
| Metric | Value | 
|---|---|
| Benefit per Farmer | ?6,000 per year | 
| Disbursed (2019–25) | ?3.69 lakh crore | 
| Beneficiaries | 11.8 crore farmers | 
Findings:
- 
Universal for landowners but excludes tenants and landless labourers. 
- 
Transparent via Aadhaar-linked DBT. 
- 
Flat payment is small compared to rising input costs. 
? Interpretation: PM-Kisan scores high on coverage and efficiency, but low on inclusivity.
Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY)
| Metric | Value | 
|---|---|
| Premium Paid (2016–25) | ?35,753 crore | 
| Claims Settled | ?1.83 lakh crore | 
| Claim Ratio | ~5x | 
Findings:
- 
Farmers receive ?5 for every ?1 paid in premium. 
- 
Adoption is strong in disaster-prone states, weak elsewhere. 
- 
Delays in settlement reduce trust. 
? Interpretation: PMFBY delivers strong income protection, but efficiency suffers due to delayed payouts and uneven state participation.
Modified Interest Subvention Scheme (MISS)
| Year | Disbursement (? crore) | 
|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 17,789.72 | 
| 2021–22 | 21,476.93 | 
| 2022–23 | 17,997.88 | 
| 2023–24 | 14,251.92 | 
| 2024–25 | 17,811.72 | 
| Total | 89,328.17 | 
Findings:
- 
Helps reduce interest costs on short-term loans. 
- 
The benefits mainly Kisan Credit Card holders. 
- 
Disbursement trends show a decline post-2021–22. 
? Interpretation: MISS supports formal credit users but fails to address the credit exclusion problem among tenant farmers.
Agriculture Infrastructure Fund (AIF)
| Metric | Value (as of June 2025) | 
|---|---|
| Sanctioned | ?66,310 crore | 
| Mobilized Investment | ?1.07 lakh crore | 
| Projects Sanctioned | 1,13,419 | 
Breakdown of Projects:
- 
30,202 custom hiring centres 
- 
22,827 processing units 
- 
15,982 warehouses 
- 
3,703 sorting & grading units 
- 
2,454 cold storage projects 
- 
38,251 other assets 
Findings:
- 
High leverage (1.6x mobilisation) indicates private sector confidence. 
- 
Benefits are indirect and long-term, unlike MSP or PM-Kisan. 
? Interpretation: AIF is India’s forward-looking farm investment strategy, addressing post-harvest gaps, but with delayed returns for farmers.
Comparative KPI Scorecard
| Scheme | Coverage | Efficiency | Equity | Impact | Overall Score (1–5) | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSP | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 
| PM-Kisan | 4.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.78 | 
| PMFBY | 3.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 
| MISS | 3.0 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3.05 | 
| AIF | 3.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 3.23 | 
? Interpretation:
- 
Best Outreach: PM-Kisan. 
- 
Best Risk Protection: PMFBY. 
- 
Most Politically Sensitive but Unequal: MSP. 
- 
Structural Investment Driver: AIF. 
- 
Credit Cost Reducer: MISS. 
Coverage Snapshot
| Scheme | Farmers Benefitted | 
|---|---|
| MSP | 1.84 crore | 
| PM-Kisan | 11.8 crore | 
| PMFBY | ~6.5 crore | 
| MISS | ~4.2 crore | 
| AIF | Indirect beneficiaries | 
? Interpretation: India’s farm support architecture is fragmented — no single scheme covers all farmers, but collectively they form a patchwork safety net.
Why ABC Live is Publishing This Report Now
- 
Rising fiscal burden on farm subsidies (>?3 lakh crore annually). 
- 
Climate shocks testing PMFBY and MSP systems. 
- 
Election-year politics highlighting farm welfare. 
- 
Global trade shifts are making domestic farm support strategically critical. 
How This Report is Unique
- 
CAG-Style Audit Framework using KPIs. 
- 
Data-Backed Unit Economics, like claim ratios, per-farmer benefits. 
- 
Comparative Insights Across Schemes instead of standalone coverage. 
- 
Equity Analysis — identifying regional/state skews. 
- 
Global Context — comparing with China, the EU, US farm supports. 
- 
Actionable “Five Fixes” for reform. 
Editorial Value
ABC Live’s Performance Audit of Farm Support Schemes 2025 is not just a report on government spending — it is a systematic accountability exercise. It blends data journalism, audit methodology, and policy analysis to provide readers — from farmers to policymakers — with a transparent, verifiable, and actionable benchmark of India’s farm support system.
Sources
- 
Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers’ Welfare: agricoop.gov.in 
- 
PM-Kisan Portal: pmkisan.gov.in 
- 
PMFBY Portal: pmfby.gov.in 
- 
Agriculture Infrastructure Fund: agriinfra.dac.gov.in 
- 
CACP Reports: cacp.dacnet.nic.in 
 
																				
















